Date   : Thu, 07 Jul 2005 21:33:49 +0100
From   : jgh@... (Jonathan Graham Harston)
Subject: Re: Introducing 'BeebWiki' the Wiki dedicated to

> Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0507061139030.351@...>
 
gARetH baBB <hick.bbc@...> wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Jul 2005, Jonathan Graham Harston wrote:
> 
> > .org should be used if a .info domain is unavailable. With .info
> > available nowadays, these sorts of sites should not be .net. If
> 
> There are possibly a few alternative roots with .info clashes - anyone
> using these will not be able to get at any ICANN based .info.
 
I can't quite make out what you're saying there.
 
> .info to me is a joke, a junk yard - I ignore it, just like .biz.
 
Just because many people put rubbish within .info doesn't mean
that proper domains shouldn't be properly named within it. After
all, most of .com is a junk yard full of rubbish content and
inappropriately named domains.
 
.info is the correct TLD for informational resources.
 

-- 
J.G.Harston - jgh@...                - mdfs.net/User/JGH
BBC BASIC for the Sinclair Spectrum - http://mdfs.net/Software/Spectrum