Date   : Mon, 29 Nov 2004 12:42:40 +0000
From   : Jules Richardson <julesrichardsonuk@...>
Subject: Re: Header times

On Mon, 2004-11-29 at 09:14 +0000, Pete Turnbull wrote:
> Not so, RFC2822 (the current standard) allows the use of certain
> specific "obsolete" time zones in date headers (section 3.3), and lists
> the allowable ones in section 4.3.  It says
> 
>   "The syntax for the obsolete date format allows a 2 digit year in
>    the date field and allows for a list of alphabetic time zone
>    specifications"
> 
> and then "EST is semantically equivalent to -0500".

Indeed. No message order problems here; Evo seems to cope with it quite
happily. 

cheers

Jules